Blogia
Vanity Fea

Semiótica

Notas sobre el dialogismo

jueves, 5 de diciembre de 2013

Notas sobre el dialogismo

Este trabajo que tenía en el SSRN va a parar a ResearchGate, junto con otra veintena más de referencias procedentes de allí... que habrá que ir actualizando y anotando.

"Notas sobre el dialogismo de Mijail Bajtin en 'El problema del texto en la lingüística, la filología y las humanidades'."

Se trata de una traducción anotada, al español, del ensayo de Mijail Bajtin "El problema del texto en la lingüística, la filología, y las humanidades: Experimento de análisis filosófico." Traduzco el texto del libro Speech Genres and Other Essays, y relaciono las reflexiones de Bajtin sobre el dialogismo con otras teorías sobre la comunicación humana, más concretamente procedentes del campo de la narratología, y también con teorías interaccionalistas y pragmáticas del uso del lenguaje, como las de Austin y Goffmann, así como con la hermenéutica de Schleiermacher. Se presta especial atención en el comentario a la cuestión de la alocución en literatura (narradores, autores implícitos, lectores implícitos).

—oOo—

This is an annotated Spanish translation of Mikhail Bakhtin's essay "The Problem of the Text in Linguistics, Philology, and the Human Sciences: An Experiment in Philosophical Analysis," from Speech Genres and Other Essays. Bakhtin's reflections on dialogism are related to other accounts of literary communication, especially from the field of narratology, and also to interactional and pragmaticist theories of language use, such as Austin's and Goffman's, as well as Schleiermacher's hermeneutics. The question of address in literature (narrators, implied authors, implied readers) is given particular prominence in the commentary.

No seré breve.




___



Otro de los que van a ResearchGate: Hierarchically Minded: Levels of Intentionality and Mind Reading.
 
 
 
 





Notas sobre el dialogismo de Mikhail Bakhtin...

Las emociones y sus nombres

jueves, 5 de diciembre de 2013

Las emociones y sus nombres. Un estudio interdisciplinar

Estuve en esta conferencia organizada por Zaragoza Lingüística:




Bibliografía sobre actos de habla

martes, 3 de diciembre de 2013

Bibliografía sobre Actos de Habla

Una de las muchas bibliografías sobre temática lingüística incluidas en mi Bibliografía de Teoría Literaria, Crítica y Filología. Un objet retrouvé — ready-made by me, en Scribd.

De Antropología Cognitiva vamos hoy

Aquí aparezco con algunos ilustres autores internacionales...

(que vienen de una Academia Presidencial rusa, de la University of California-Berkeley, del Instituto Max Planck, de la Universidad de Oxford, etc.—y de Zaragoza yo).

—en una de las revistas del Anthropology Research Network, en concreto Cultural Anthropology eJournal, sección de "Historia y Etnohistoria" (VER FECHA 11 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2013).

AARN Subject Matter eJournals
    

Cultural Anthropology eJournal - CMBO

        

AARN: History & Ethnohistory (Topic) - CMBO



El artículo en cuestión es aquél sobre "Retroperspectiva y perspicacia", a cuenta de Polibio y del curioso ensayo sobre "The Rise of Historical Criticism" de Oscar Wilde. Y va a aparecer mi artículo, al parecer, en otras revistas de otras redes académicas—por interdisciplinar que no quede.


Anclaje narrativo y círculo hermenéutico en un texto de Polibio
A photo on Flickr

Cognitive Anthropology Top Ten

lunes, 4 de noviembre de 2013

Cognitive Anthropology (Top Ten)

Mi artículo Hierarchically Minded: Levels of Intentionality and Mind Reading ha sido distribuido en una revista de antropología del Social Science Research Network, Psychological Anthropology eJournal,  y ahora figura en esta lista de top ten de "Antropología cognitiva".

 

A photo on Flickr

CFP - 5th Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative

martes, 29 de octubre de 2013

CFP- 5th Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (Quebec)

Fifth Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (CMN'14)
July 31 - August 2, 2014
Quebec City Conference Center, Quebec City, Canada
http://narrative.csail.mit.edu/cmn14/

Important Dates:

April 11, 2014. Submission deadline.
May 9, 2014. Notification of acceptance.
May 30, 2014. Final versions due.
July 23-26, 2014. CogSci 2014.
July 27-31, 2014. AAAI-14.
July 26-31, 2014. CNS 2014.
July 31 - August 2, 2014. Workshop in Quebec City.

Workshop Aims

Narratives are ubiquitous in human experience. We use them to
communicate, convince, explain, and entertain. As far as we know,
every society in the world has narratives, which suggests they are
rooted in our psychology and serve an important cognitive function. It
is becoming increasingly clear that to truly understand and explain
human intelligence, beliefs, and behaviors, we will have to understand
why and to what extent narrative is universal and explain (or explain
away) the function it serves. The aim of this workshop series is to
address key questions that advance our understanding of narrative at
multiple levels: from the psychological and cognitive impact of
narratives to our ability to model narrative responses
computationally.

Special Focus: Neuroscience

This inter-disciplinary workshop will be an appropriate venue for
papers addressing fundamental topics and questions regarding narrative.
The workshop will be held in association with the following meetings:

  - The 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
  - The 28th Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  - The 23rd Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting

The workshop will have a special focus on the neuroscience of
narrative. Papers should be relevant to issues fundamental to the
computational modeling and scientific understanding of narrative; we
especially welcome papers relevant to the neuroscientific and cognitive
aspects of narrative. Regardless of its focus, reported work should
provide some sort of insight of use to computational modeling of
narratives. Discussing technological applications or motivations is not
prohibited, but is not required. We accept both finished research and
more tentative exploratory work.

Illustrative Topics and Questions
   - What are the neural correlates of narrative or narrative
     processing?
   - How can we study narrative from a neuroscientific or cognitive
     point of view?
   - Can narrative be subsumed by current models of higher-level
     cognition, or does it require new approaches?
   - How do narratives mediate our cognitive experiences, or affect our
     cognitive abilities?
   - How are narratives indexed and retrieved? Is there a universal
     scheme for encoding episodic information?
   - What comprises the set of possible narrative arcs? Is there such a
     set? How many possible story lines are there?
   - Is narrative structure universal, or are there systematic
     differences in narratives from different cultures?
   - What makes narrative different from a list of events or facts?
     What is special that makes something a narrative?
   - What are the details of the relationship between narrative and
     common sense?
   - What shared resources are required for the computational study of
     narrative? What should a “Story Bank” contain?
   - What shared resources are available, or how can already-extant
     resources be adapted to the study of narrative?
   - What are appropriate formal or computational representations for
     narrative?
   - How should we evaluate computational and formal models of
     narrative?

Organizers:
   - Mark A. Finlayson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, U.S.A.)
   - Jan Christoph Meister (Universitaet Hamburg, Germany)
   - Emile Bruneau (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, U.S.A.)

Searle en mi bibliografía

viernes, 18 de octubre de 2013

Searle en mi bibliografía

Y en Scribd, y aquí. De J. R. Searle, teorizador de los actos de habla, de la intencionalidad y de la consciencia, oí hablar por primera vez creo en 1984, en las clases de pragmática que nos daba Carmen Olivares a veces en lugar de la didáctica de la lengua inglesa, que le aburría. Y me sirvió mucho para mi tesis aquí y para mi tesis de máster en Brown; lo leí bastante en los 80. Y la polémica que con él tuvo Derrida, en Limited Inc. Ahí sigue encapsulada la polémica, como en un vial of consciousness. Últimamente lo he vuelto a encontrar en YouTube, como a tantos famosos profesores y pensadores que jamás pensé ver por la tele. También allí queda encapsulado mucho pasado que era presente mientras lo filmaban—y que en parte sigue siendo no lo que ya pasó, sino lo que ya está y sigue estando presente

Searle.J.R




John Searle on the Philosophy of Language 
 


Alea jacta erit

martes, 1 de octubre de 2013

Alea jacta erit

Una conferencia patrocinada por Project Narrative:

Mark Currie
"
Alea Jacta Erit: Narrative in a Random Universe" 

Monday, October 7, 2013 - 4:00pm

Rosa M. Ailabouni Room
  


How can we relate ideas about uncertainty, unpredictability and randomness to the study of narrative? This lecture approaches the question through one of the most tenacious metaphors in the thinking about temporality – the roll of a dice. It sketches a general context of thought about contingency in the predictive sciences and a more particular account of the way that contingency and futurity have figured in new debates in the humanities in recent years. The argument then turns to the commingling of epistemic stances that are involved in the temporal structure of narrative fiction and the process of narrative comprehension. It aims to show that the dynamic of certainty and uncertainty that structures narrative involves a non-synthetic alternation between futurity and completion which finds its philosophical basis in the motif of the future anterior: not alea jacta est, but alea jacta erit.


Mark Currie is Professor at Queen Mary University of London. He is the author of Postmodern Narrative Theory (1998; Second Edition 2011), Difference (2004), About Time: Narrative Fiction and the Philosophy of Time (2007), The Unexpected: Narrative Temporality and the Philosophy of Surprise (2012) and The Invention of Deconstruction (2013).



—A relacionar con la temática de la retrospección y hindsight bias que tanto me ocupa.

Tomorrow will have been written