Blogia

Vanity Fea

Lip dub Promocion 2011 15 Estudios Ingleses UNIZAR

martes, 26 de mayo de 2015

Lip dub Promocion 2011 15 Estudios Ingleses UNIZAR






Garrick, Shakespeare, y la paradoja del comediante

martes, 26 de mayo de 2015

 

La Paradoja del Comediante, o del actor, fue formulada por Diderot en un ensayo que tenía a David Garrick como ejemplo principal. En este artículo observamos la similaridad entre dicha paradoja y la "capacidad negativa" atribuida por diversos críticos a los grandes dramaturgos y más en concreto a Shakespeare. Se sugiere una base común para ambos fenómenos en la naturaleza mimética de la gestualidad y de la comunicación humanas, algo que podría proporcionar una solución a la paradoja desde una perspectiva neuroestética:

 

Garrick, Shakespeare, y la paradoja del comediante


http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2605043
 
 
English Abstract: 
 

Garrick, Shakespeare, and the Player's Paradox

The Player's Paradox, or the Paradox of Acting, was formulated by Diderot in an essay dealing with David Garrick as a major example. In this paper we note the similarity between the Player's Paradox and the "negative capability" a number of critics have ascribed to great dramatists and most particularly to Shakespeare. A common grounding of both phenomena in the mimetic nature of human communication and gestuality is suggested, which might provide a solution to the paradox from the standpoint of neuroaesthetics.
 

 

Note: Downloadable document is in Spanish.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11


http://ssrn.com/abstract=2605043


Artículo aceptado en estas revistas y páginas temáticas de las redes de Antropología, Ciencia cognitiva y Literatura inglesa:


eJournal Classifications (May 13, 2015)
AARN Subject Matter eJournals
             
AARN Subject Matter eJournals
                          
CSN Subject Matter eJournals
                          
LIT Subject Matter eJournals
    





 También se encuentra aquí:


_____. "Garrick, Shakespeare, y la paradoja del comediante." In García Landa, Vanity Fea 19 Oct. 2013.*
    http://vanityfea.blogspot.com.es/2013/10/garrick-shakespeare-y-la-paradoja-del.html
         2013
_____. "Garrick, Shakespeare, y la paradoja del comediante." Academia 19 Dec. 2014.* https://www.academia.edu/9838396/
         2014
_____. "Garrick, Shakespeare, y la paradoja del comediante." Ibercampus (Vanity Fea) 3 Feb. 2015.*

           http://www.ibercampus.es/garrick-shakespeare-y-la-paradoja-del-comediante-29509.htm

         2015




—oOo—

 

 

A photo on Flickr

Under the Boardwalk

lunes, 25 de mayo de 2015







Mariano ha matado al PP y lo lleva a cuestas

lunes, 25 de mayo de 2015






Whig History and Mind Minding

lunes, 25 de mayo de 2015

A commentary to a post in New Savannah, "beyond Whig history to Evolutionary thinking":

Whig history shouldn't be entirely avoided, in the sense that a Whiggish sensibility does have some use in detecting those elements that (oh yes) eventually lead to a Whiggish disposition, which after all has not emerged from nowhere. Of course there is the attendant danger of hindsight bias etc. which has to be kept in mind. But at bottom this is an issue much resembling the question of the anthropic principle in evolution: wrong if you make highter consciousness a teleological aim in evolution, right if it forces you to reconize that, after all the whole tangled web of life, consciousness is both the most complex evolutionary phenomenon (or perhaps in a weaker formulation, one of the most complex evolutionary phenomena) and the only one where reflexive models on evolution are built (not so, e.g., in otherwise incredibly complex and refined cases of mimetism or animal/vegetable coevolution). That's one sense in which evolution IS, after all, directional, and not a mere matter of wiggling around. It is cumulative in many ways detailed both by Darwin and by population genetics, and it is also cumulative at the level of culture, which has been called Lamarckian in the sense that cultural evolution does preserve favorable acquired traits in a direct way. Now I would also say that considering that writers and reviewers are deliberate (or "Lamarckian") subjects is only the bare minumum; the intentional directionality of evolution has to take into account also the way minds make plans or make choices which direct and guide behaviour and thence evolution; I think this is in part the role of Darwin's 'sexual selection' being at all different from 'natural selection'; that is, in sexual selection it is a mind that makes the selection, whereas in natural selection it is the play of chance and the struggle for life. The role of minds has been underrated in evolutionary biology, but surely this is a mistake that evolutionary psychology is not supposed to repeat!


Rocío Orsi, Butterfield y la razón histórica: La interpretación Whig de la historia 
 



—oOo— 
 

The God Delusion (Richard Dawkins)

Audiobook:





Federico comenta las municipales

lunes, 25 de mayo de 2015

Federico comenta las municipales (AUDIO)

Bucles en la mente

lunes, 25 de mayo de 2015

Bucles en la mente

La realidad humana es tanto física como virtual; se construye interaccionalmente en un proceso dialéctico que comprende el entorno físico y social, la interiorización de ese entorno, y las representaciones simbólicas. Es una "realidad aumentada" que en parte nos rodea a modo de nicho ecológico, y en parte es también una proyección mental, en un proceso que podría definirse como una especie de alucinación colectiva consensuada. La estructura de la actividad cerebral tal como es descrita por Michael Gazzaniga puede tomarse como el correlato neurológico de la perspectiva proporcionada desde la psicología social por G. H. Mead y los interaccionistas simbólicos. 

 

 hindsight mirror

Loops in the Mind: Self-Interaction, Brain Feedback, and Reality as a Self-Fulfilling Expectation


English Abstract: Human reality is both physical and virtual; it is built interactionally through a dialectic which comprises the physical and social environment, the interiorization of that environment, and symbolic representations. It is an "augmented reality" which partly surrounds us as an ecological niche and is also partly a mental projection, in a process which might be defined as a kind of consensual collective hallucination. Michael Gazzaniga's account of brain activity may be taken as usefully providing the neural correlates for the social psychological perspective proposed by G. H. Mead and the symbolic interactionists.

Note: Downloadable document is in Spanish.
 

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Ibercampus, April 2015





eJournal Classifications  (10 May 2015)
AARN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
AARN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
CSN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        





La autointeracción, la retroalimentación cerebral, y la realidad como expectativa autocumplida