Blogia

Vanity Fea

Linguistic Studies Top Ten

miércoles, 14 de diciembre de 2016

Linguistic Studies Top Ten


Dear Jose Angel Garcia Landa:

Your paper, "CLASSICAL CRITICISM AFTER ARISTOTLE", was recently listed on SSRN's Top Ten download list for: Anthropology and Archaeology Research Network: Linguistic Studies (Topic).

As of 14 December 2016, your paper has been downloaded 146 times. You may view the abstract and download statistics at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2421471.

Top Ten Lists are updated on a daily basis. Click the following link(s) to view the Top Ten list for:

AARN: Linguistic Studies (Topic) Top Ten.

Click the following link(s) to view all the papers in:

AARN: Linguistic Studies (Topic) All Papers.

The Eye in the Sky is the Eye Inside

miércoles, 14 de diciembre de 2016

The Eye in the Sky is the Eye Inside

 plaza george orwell

The eye in the sky, and the judgement in the afterlife, are the ultimate police force. All the more so because they are not just in the sky or in the afterlife, they become interiorized as a part of our personality structure, the super-ego Freud wrote about. It’s such a handy and effective way to manufacture acquiescent and cooperative social subjects that one can only marvel that it needed so many millennia in order to be perfected.


This is by way of commentary to an interview on social and religious evolution by Joseph Henrich ("Conversations with Tyler", audio).

This interiorized god as a personification of social values was theorized (albeit in an implicit way) by George Herbert Mead in his notion of the "generalized other." And, earlier still, by Adam Smith with his notion of the "impartial spectator." More about Smith’s interiorized sociality here (in Spanish).


—oOo—

Philip Roth

Philip Roth

 

from American Literature: A History, by Hans Bertens and Theo d’Haen



(from "After the war: 1945-80 - Jewish American novelists") (...)


Still, although Malamud’s characters are not invariably Jewish, in his presentation of Jewish milieus in The Assistant and in his early stories he is the most Jewish of all Jewish American writers of the fifties and sixties. Here, mainstream America is a vague presence in the background, just like Poland and its inhabitants only feature in the distance in the ghettos and streets of I.B. Singer’s stories (Gimpel  the Fool, 1957; The Spinoza of Market Street, 1961) or novels (The Family Moskat, 1950; The Magician of Lublin, 1960). Far more usual in Jewish American fiction is a continuous interaction with mainstream American culture and an unending negotiation of territorial boundaries. Such interaction even takes place when mainstream America is nowhere in sight, as in the title story of Philip Roth’s Goodbye, Columbus (1959), a wistful story about class differences within Newark’s Jewish community, in which the narrator’s lover-for-a-summer has had her nose ’fixed’—’I was pretty. Now I’m prettier"–to conform to mainstream standards of beauty. With this collection of stories, Roth (1933) found himself at the center of controversy, especially because of the stories ’Defender of the Faith’, in which a calculating Jeish soldier tries to exploit the loyalty he expects from a Jewish superior, and ’Eli, the Fanatic’, in which suburban, assimilated Jews try to prevent orthodox co-religionists from establishin a yeshiva in their mostly gentile neighborhood. Roth’s fiercest critics, supset by what seemed a cynical view of middle-class American Jewry, accused him of self-hatred, even of anti-Semitism. What Roth captures in ’Eli’ is the self-censorship and the dissembling that in the 1950s were part and parcel of assimilation and the deep sense of alienation—experienced here by the lawyer hired by his fellow Jews—that such a forced way of living may bring with it. This is in fact one of the overriding themes in Jewish-American writing of the first decades after the war. In order to be accepted by mainstream America, Jewish Americans abandon much of what may characterize them as Jews—sometimes, as in ’Goodbye, Columbus’, even the shape of their nose—and move out of typically Jewish neighborhoods. But that estranges them from their background while their new environment never fully accepts them, leading to a sort of alienation that differs from that felt by young mainstream Americans but is felt even more profoundly.

After two rather traditional novels featuring a more mainstream cast and dealing with the familiar themes of relationships and personal problems and ambitions (Letting Go, 1962, and When She Was Good, 1967), Roth returned to more specifically Jewish themes with Portnoy’s Complaint (1969), a virtuoso rant on a psychiatrist’s couch in which the novel’s protagonist, Alexander Portnoy, exhaustively lists all his frustrations at having been brought up Jewish, and in between details his insatiable lusting after blonde, all-American girls. Lust would from then on return regularly in Roth’s novels, as in The Professor of Desire (1977) or the fairly recent Sabbath’s Theater (1995), and has contributed disproportionally to his public image, but in those novels, too, Roth is concerned with Jewishness, even if he sees himself first of all as an American writer. In the last four decades, Roth has brilliantly chronicled Jewish life in the Newark of his younger years and has through an alter ego, the Roth-like writer Nathan Zuckerman who features in for instance Zuckerman Bound (1985) and The Counterlife (1987), offered incisive meditations on what it means to be a Jewish American writer. Early in his career Roth worried that ’the actuality is continually outdoing our talents’, that the technical skills of American writers were no longer a match for the outrageous images and events that the culture casually produced. Fortunately, those fears were unfounded.


(From "The End and Return of History: 1980-2010 - Philip Roth")

Philip Roth has remained extremely prolific also after 1980, even to the point of becoming perhaps the iconic American author of the entire period. To begin with, Roth wrote a third novel in the David Kepesh series with The Dying Animal. Then, he has continued the series of novels featuring Nathan Zuckerman, the first instalment of which, The Ghost Writer, appeared in 1979, and the seventh, presumably also the last given its title of Exit Ghost, in 2007, with as other titles Zukerman Unbound (1981), The Anatomy Lesson (1983), The Prague Orgy (1985), The Counterlife (1986), American Pastoral (1997), I Married a Communist (1998) and The Human Stain (2000). Zuckerman has often been interrpeted as an alter ego for Roth himself, but as of 1990 there also started appearing a new series featuring a protagonist called ’Roth’, comprising Deception: A Novel (1990), Operation Shylock: A Confession (1993) and The Plot Against America (2004). There is also a free-standing novel, Sabbath’s Theatre (1995), and finally a series of short novels, Everyman (2006), Indignation (2008), The Humbling (2009) and Nemesis (2010). We will here briefly treat three exemplary instances from this overwhelming oeuvre.

American Pastoral, winner of the Pulitzer Prize in 1998, starts from the premise of the good life in the country as the culmination of the American Dream and a counterweight to the chaos, oppression and misery of the Old World. This is also what the protagonist of the story, whose life Zuckerman records, seems to have been bound for all his life, until everything fell apart. The novel is set in Newark, and the turning point is the 1960s, when Newark’s earlier prosperity has melted away under the onslaught of beginning globalization, the city’s older population of first and second generation immigrants, many of them Jewish, like the protagonist, have moved away or been minoritized by the large numbers of African Americans that have moved in. Instead of a harmonious community Newark now is the scene of race riots and labor conflicts. On the level of the U.S. as a whole the havoc wrought in Newark repeats itself in the radical youth and political movements rocking the country. Roth returns a hard verdict on what has gone wrong with America during his own lifetime.

A similar feeling speaks from The Plot Against America, winnner of the Sidewise Award for Alternate History in 2005. Roth finds his initial inspiration in a plea Charles Lindbergh, the first man to cross the Atlantic by airplane in 1927 and a national hero, made in 1941 to prevent the U.S. from entering World War II, for which he blamed the Jews, the British, and President Roosevelt. Lindbergh was in good standing with the Nazi regime and especially with Goering, the commander of the German air force. Roth takes the poetic liberty of situating Lindbergh’s speech not in 1941 but in 1940, in the run-up to that year’s Presidential elections, and casting Lindbergh as the Republican challenger of Roosevelt. When Lindbergh wins the election, life in the U.S. turns bitter for American Jews, and hence also for little Philip Roth. Things look even more somber when Lindbergh disappears on a solo flight with his famous Spirit of St. Louis airplane and Vice-President Wheeler, an extreme rightwing politician, assumes office. In the end, everything returns to normal, Rososevelt triumphs in a special election, Pearl Harbor signals the entry of the U.S. into World War II, and history resumes its familiar course. The Plot Against America asks some hard questions about the nature of American democracy and American politics more generally. For most commentators it was hardly a coincidence that Roth published a novel focusing on these questions, and with such characters, in the run-up to the 2004 elections, with an incumbent who in the wake of 9/11 had institued an authoritarian regime such as the U.S. had hardly ever seen before, and with a Vice-President of known conservative sympathies.

If American Pastoral and The Plot Against America address wider social and political issues, Everyman sticks to the personal level. In all of Roth’s later work the consciousness of approaching death is overwhelmingly present, and particularly so in the foru short novels he published towards the end of his career (Roth in 2013 announced that he thought he had written enough and would write no more). In the futher unspecified ’he’ protagonist Roth gives us a reincarnation of the medieval ’everyman’ from the eponymous morality play. but whereas the medieval Everyman finds that with death all material worries and constraints dissolve and only spiritual virtues remain, because after death comes resurrection, noting of the sort happens in Roth’s version. Everyman as the chronicle of a death announced, a merciless march from the cradle to the grave marked by disease, illness, the relentless deterioration of the body, deaths and funerals. Like the medieval play it holds up the mirror of our own fallibility and ephemerality, but without the consolation of faith.



Ray Bradbury y Philip Roth



—oOo—




Otra foto en la tarde bonita

Otra foto en la tarde bonita

 

Otra foto en la tarde bonita

Retropost (2006): Ideology and Evolution

Retropost #1262 (14 de diciembre de 2006): Ideology and Evolution


A message I just sent to the Narrative List, commenting an editorial of today’s New York Times Online, on the influence of culture in the evolution of the human species:


"We are used to the idea that species evolve because of changes in their natural environment. But part of the natural environment of humans is culture itself, and it is striking to think that genetic adaptation in humans has been driven, at least in part, by how humans have chosen to live. The dynamism of human culture has always seemed to move faster than evolution itself, but this discovery suggests otherwise. To understand this about ourselves is to realize how little we know about the long-term effects of the ways we choose to live." 
Thus the editorial. And my commentary:

Re:
>
> "We are used to the idea that species evolve because of changes in their natural environment. But part of the natural environment of humans is culture itself",
>

Sure, if natural selection has some say in the survival of the fittest, culture certainly does have some pretty clear ideas about who are the fittest... (or prettiest, or ugliest, or richest...). And these "evolutionary criteria" are spread, and reworked, through literature, and through other ideological apparatuses and communicative protocols. Stephen Jay Gould used to say that unlike biological evolution, cultural change is Lamarckian, preserving (some) acquired traits (and rejecting others, I guess).
PS. The discussion continues. Brian McHale considers terms such as Lamarckian etc. are metaphorical when applied to culture. Tony Jackson agrees:
i think i have to agree with Brian. though it’s plenty intriguing to think the analogy between bio and cultural evolution, you have to leave a lot out to get it to work.
 
as i understand it, evolution involves a random mutation on the genetic level that, if a whole raft of just plain lucky other stuff is in place, can lead to a larger-scale change that, if a whole raft of other just plain lucky other stuff is in place, can then possibly become an inherited trait. How would we figure in the randomness that is, as i understand it, essential to natural selection??
 
tony j
And I rejoin:

Actually I agree that "Lamarckian" or "Darwinian" as applied to cultural phenomena only yield (at best) useful metaphors. One should not renounce the heuristic value of those analogies, though. Evolutionary doctrine proved pretty fruitful as a source of ideas for Brunetière (who came before the Russian Formalists and before Eliot, who also drew on him in this respect I think). There is no reason why some of these notions, in their present-day versions, might not spur similarly fruitful ideas now. Think for instance of Gould’s emphasis on catastrophism, massive extinction, and randomness as an evolutionary "engine": the wiping out of a culture, literally or in the cultural colonialist sense of wiping out, certainly has likewise some visible effects on the memetics of that culture’s productions and their contribution to the globalized melting pot.

And, taking another tack, there is certainly an evolutionary dimension to literature as a cultural phenomenon—evolutionary in the literal sense. This ought to be dealt with in its own proper level (which to some extent at least means literary history, literary theory, cultural criticism etc., rather than biology), but there is, to be sure, much work to be done in exploring the evolutionary implications of cultural phenomena and the links between the emergence of specific phenomena and a general theory of human evolution, more specifically the evolution of consciousness. I am thinking of evolutionary and emergentist philosophy, going back to Vico, and in the American tradition to thinkers such as Peirce and George Herbert Mead. Now which is the specific emergentist import of a given literary figure, a given use of point of view, or of represented speech, or which is the specific contribution to the development of consciousness of this or that theorist’s work...  that’s too long for a play.


No evolucionaremos


Retroposts
—oOo—

Retropost (2006): Fotos de París

Fotos de París

Publicado en Imágenes. com. José Ángel García Landa

Aquí una inédita de los quais de la rive gauche:

Quais de la Seine

 

 

Y las demás en mi fotoblog.

Fr/antic

 

 

Etiquetas: Fotos, París, Viajes

 

Retropost (2006): Indicios de calidad y torbellinos de información

miércoles, 14 de diciembre de 2016

Retropost #1261 (14 de diciembre de 2006): Indicios de calidad y torbellinos de información



Bueno, pues tras estudiar mis indicios de calidad, citas, reseñas, etc., necesarios para obtener El Tramo, por fin opto por seleccionar estas publicaciones, pocas pueden ser las elegidas...

José Angel García Landa (Universidad de Zaragoza)  – Evaluación CNEAI 2006 (periodo evaluado: 2000-2005).
 
INDICIOS DE CALIDAD de los cinco trabajos incluidos en el currículum abreviado.

1. Artículo "The Poetics of Subliminal Awareness: Re-reading Intention and Narrative Structure in Vladimir Nabokov’s ’Christmas Story’".
 
La revista EJES: European Journal of English Studies es la publicación oficial de la European Society for the Study of English (ESSE), la sociedad oficial de anglistas europea, que agrupa a las diversas asociaciones nacionales, incluyendo a la asociación de anglistas españoles, AEDEAN, como puede verse en su sitio web.
http://www.essenglish.org/ejes.html
 
EJES es una revista académica del máximo prestigio internacional en el área, completamente referenciada para asegurar la calidad de sus publicaciones, como puede verse en el sitio web de la misma; está publicada para ESSE por la prestigiosa editorial académica Routledge (grupo Taylor and Francis):
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13825577.asp
 
Mi artículo ha sido referenciado en Estetica: Una Bibliografia Internazionale, publicada por la Sociedad Italiana de Estética: http://www.siestetica.it/biblio.php?char=full&frame=content&anno=2004

También está distribuido en red por la British Library:
http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=154763843&ETOC=RN&from=searchengine

2. Capítulo de libro: "Overhearing Narrative."
La editorial Walter de Gruyter (Berlín y Nueva York) es una editorial de referencia internacional en el campo de la lingüística y el análisis del discurso. La serie "Narratologia" está especializada en teoría de la narración, con participación de las principales autoridades mundiales en el campo.
 
Información sobre el volumen The Dynamics of Narrative Form: Studies in Anglo-American Narratology, en la página web del mismo en la editorial:
http://www.degruyter.com/rs/bookSingle.cfm?id=IS-3110183145-1&fg=LI&l=E

Mi capítulo ha recibido una valoración extremadamente favorable del destacado narratólogo Didier Coste, en un importante artículo-reseña del volumen: "Le récit comme forme-mouvement." (Reseña de The Dynamics of Narrative Form. Ed. John Pier), en Fabula 7.5 (24 Oct. 2006):
http://www.fabula.org/revue/document1641.php
 
El volumen también ha sido reseñado por Joanna Gavins, "The Year’s Work in Stylistics 2004: Old Dogs, New Tricks." Language and Literature 14.4 (Nov. 2005): 397-408. Edición en red:
http://lal.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/14/4/397

3. Artículo: "Retroactive Thematization, Interaction, and Interpretation: The Hermeneutic Spiral from Schleiermacher to Goffman."
 
BELL: Belgian English Language and Literature es una revista académica de Filología Inglesa que cumple todos los requisitos relativos a consejo editorial, reseñas anónimas, control de endogamia, etc. contemplados en esta convocatoria, según puede verse en su página web:
http://www.ulb.ac.be/philo/baahe/BELL2004.html
 
Es la revista oficial de la asociación belga de anglistas universitarios, BAAHE (http://www.baahe.be/),

El artículo también ha aparecido traducido al español, en un volumen de filosofía hermenéutica editado por un grupo de investigación especializado en el tema: José Ángel García Landa, "Tematización retroactiva, interacción e interpretación: La espiral hermenéutica de Schleiermacher a Goffman." En Hans-Georg Gadamer: Ontología estética y hermenéutica. Ed. Teresa Oñate y Zubía, Cristina García Santos and Miguel Ángel Quintana Paz. Con el grupo de investigación "Grupo de Investigaciones estético-políticas Palimpsestos". Facultad de Filosofía, UNED. Madrid: Dykinson, 2005. 679-88. Información sobre el libro: http://www.uma.es/gadamer/OnateI.htm

También es recogido el artículo en bibliografías especializadas, como la Bibliografía sobre Gadamer:
http://www.uma.es/gadamer/Bbl-esp.htm

En el prólogo a "Hans-Georg Gadamer: El Lógos de la era hermenéutica", volumen nº 20 de la revista filosófica   Endoxa (UNED, Madrid, 2005), la Dra. Teresa Oñate alaba la "excelencia académica" de mi artículo y otros incluidos en el volumen.
4. Capítulo de libro. "Catastrophism and Hindsight: Narrative Hermeneutics in Biology and in Historiography."
 
El volumen Beyond Borders ha aparecido en la serie Anglistische Forschungen, de la universidad de Heidelberg, posiblemente la serie de Filología más prestigiosa entre las publicadas en Europa.
 
Ha recibido varias reseñas, todas favorables, entre ellas:
 
Crews, Brian. Reseña de Beyond Borders: Re-Defining Generic and Ontological Boundaries. Ed. Ramón Plo-Alastrué and María Jesús Martínez-Alfaro. Atlantis 25.1 (June 2003): 133-39. (En red: http://www.atlantisjournal.org/Papers/25_1/133-140_Crews.pdf).
 
Gómez Acosta, Marta, y Juan Ignacio Oliva. Reseña de Beyond Borders: Re-defining Generic and Ontological Boundaries. Ed. Ramón Plo-Alastrué and María Jesús Martínez-Alfaro. Revista de Filología de la Universidad de La Laguna 22 (2004): 342-44. (Información: http://webpages.ull.es/users/rfull/rfull-22.htm).
 
Martín, Sara. Rev. of Beyond Borders: Re-defining Generic and Ontological Boundaries. Ed. Ramón Plo-Alastrué and María Jesús Martínez-Alfaro. Anglistik 15.1 ( March 2004): 184-187. (Información: http://www.anglistenverband.de/2004_1.php).
Esta última reseña destaca particularmente mi capítulo por su interés en el conjunto del volumen.


5. Capítulo de libro. "Adaptation, Appropriation, Retroaction: Symbolic Interaction with Henry V."
 
Es un estudio seleccionado a resultas de una convocatoria abierta anunciada internacionalmente para un volumen sobre adaptación, y publicado en la editorial académica internacional Rodopi (Amsterdam y Nueva York).
 
Hay en curso reseñas del volumen Books in Motion, así Beatriz Oria,  reseña de Books in Motion. Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship. Mireia Aragay (ed.) Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2005”. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies (2006).

Mi capítulo ha sido destacado con mención especialmente favorable en un artículo bibliográfico escrito por dos especialistas shakespeareanos:
 
Ton Hoenselaars y Paul Franssen. "Update on the Shakespeare Industry." Staple of News 11 (July 2006).
http://shakespeare.let.uu.nl/staple11.htm

Tengo alguna otra reseña por allí, pero hélàs, es sobre otras publicaciones que no presento. Mi célebre bibliografía online por fin no la he puesto, por temor a la cuadrícula legal, que aunque ahora sí deja lugar a formatos no impresos, sigue considerando únicamente como objeto de evaluación "libros", "capítulos de libro", "artículos" y "patentes". Es patente que mi bibliografía no es ninguna de estas cosas, y que por estar en mi web sigue teniendo un aire de autopublicación. Aunque me la hayan publicado también en Oxford, y tenga numerosos enlaces (de la Biblioteca del Congreso USA, de la Encyclopeadia Britannica, de la Linguist List, del MIT, de la Universidad de Oxford, de la de París, de la de Manchester, de Google, blabla...), y aunque me lleve muchos años de trabajo—me temo que para sexenios no cubica.
En realidad, lo que más llama la atención es la escasez de eco, de respuesta y diálogo de tanta publicación académica, y la desproporción de tan poco diálogo (cita, referencia, reseña etc.) con el esfuerzo que cuesta prepararlas. Es como para retirarse, o como para pasarse a un medio más interactivo, los blogs, pongamos, de no ser porque mi blog también carece de conversación, y produce una curiosa sensación de "ah de la vida, nadie me responde". 

Si tu artículo, por bueno que sea, no está en una revista recogida por el Citation Index (como no lo están la mitad de nuestra especialidad, o más)—pues ya es peor. Y en realidad es dificilísimo lograr que alguien te cite. Con lo cual se justificaría el sistema de las citas... de no ser porque, visto lo difícil que es, muchas citas son "amañadas" entre grupos de simpatizantes directamente en microsociedades de mutuo apoyo o cita recíproca. A veces explícitamente. Más frecuentemente, estas estrategias son producto de una pacto de silencio entre caballeros (y damas también): si te cito, es un punto para mí, me debes una, aunque no lo mencionaremos.  Una cita, o una invitación, o ya veremos. Esto se piensa y se hace, pero no se dice, faltaría más. En cuanto a los que tienen muuuchas citas, con frecuencia son resultado no sólo de la calidad, que también sucede y no lo voy a negar, sino de los torbellinos de información que se crean en cualquier comunidad cuando ésta se vuelve inabarcable. Como nadie puede leer todo lo que se publica en su campo, no digo ya todo, no se puede leer ni la centésima parte, hacen falta puntos de referencia para la discusión, y éstos se crean tanto por gravitación natural de la calidad como por circunstancias azarosas y poco medibles. Al igual que hacen falta famosos que no sean famosos por nada en las revistas del corazón, también hacen falta estos torbellinos de información en las disciplinas... aunque muchas veces su contribución es más divulgativa, o aun contraproducente por lo que tiene de ideas recibidas, que auténticamente creadora. Son referencias reconocibles para orientar una discusión, y ese es su auténtico valor. Que también será un valor, supongo. Pero premiando las citas también se premia el azar, no sólo la calidad.

El mayor valor que tienen las citas y otros criterios cuantificables... es, precisamente, que son cuantificables. Y que no se requiere entrar a opinar directamente sobre la calidad que supuestamente es lo que se está evaluando. Evaluación sin evaluación. Y esa mensurabilidad a piñón fijo y sin valoración añadida es lo que quiere, o necesita, quien recibe el embolado de evaluar diez mil publicaciones. 

Hale, pues ahí van los papeles, y si no me cae el sexenio, que le den bola. Es una evaluación hecha con criterios bastante cuadriculados, que si bien puede dar lugar a resultados aproximados a vista de pájaro, también produce grandes injusticias y arbitrariedades. Y además se utiliza a nivel local para dar lugar a rencillas y acogotamientos; es un argumento, el del sexenio, utilizable en manipulaciones diversas cuando resulta oportuno introducirlo para los que Tienen. En fin, que aunque tengo "varios" sexenios, firmé un manifiesto contra ellos, o contra el uso que les da la Administración para crear cuerpos de funcionarios evanescentes, y atacar un principio legal que reza así: "Los Profesores Titulares y Catedráticos tienen plena capacidad docente e investigadora"...  Hasta le envié una queja al Defensor del Pueblo, vamos. Protestando por la manera en que se saca de madre un complemento salarial. Demasiado valor administrativo se le da, y simbólico ya ni te cuento. Una auténtica zanahoria para que trote la emulación universitaria.

¡Aunque espero que no se me tenga en cuenta el haber protestado contra el uso de los sexenios, y no se piensen ahora que no lo quiero!

Incitación al ombliguismo


Retroposts
—oOo—

A World of Pure Experience - William James' Radical Empiricism

martes, 13 de diciembre de 2016

A World of Pure Experience - William James' Radical Empiricism